SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low-Cost Long-Range Airdrop Delivery

Award identifier e09176043bb34a48b1d5b6ebf4326ba3d2c2c77744bb93433c877ccabdb872a8Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,793,510

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
ZONE 5 TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Proposal award date
2024-08-19
Contract end date
2025-11-19
UEI
FKA7P3EC8GV3
Solicitation number
24.1
Topic code
AF241-D019

Research abstract

Zone 5 has outlined essential design features critical to the success of the Low-Cost Long Range Air Drop (LCLRAD) program and its missions.  The Zone 5 system is designed with the following enabling attributes: Turbine Powered Propulsion: Turbine propulsion significantly enhances the vehicle’s operational utility.  A turbine reduces the vehicle's total weight, simplifies manufacturing and assembly, dramatically decreases Time to Target (T2T), preserves range in adverse wind conditions, and significantly reduces intercept options. Flexible Palletized Launch System: LCLRAD is designed using Zone 5’s PAC-RAT launcher.  PAC-RAT uses standard aircrew and air launch procedures and has successfully demonstrated single and multi-vehicle launched of CLEAVER low-cost cruise missiles using AFSOC C-130 and commercial Short SC.7 Skyvan and Short C-23 Sherpa cargo aircraft.  These tests lay the foundation of success that directly benefits all future applications.   Modular Open System Architecture:  By building on a Government MOSA framework, the LCLRAD program can accelerate development and enable software re-use from similar programs.  LCLRAD will be built using Zone 5’s flight proven Weapon Open System Architecture (WOSA) software stack.  It features modular software components that communicate through industry standard ARINC-653 interfaces and can be easily tailored or replaced to support LCLRAD specific requirements and capabilities.   Simplified and Streamlined Manufacturing Process: Our approach to the LCLRAD program leverages the infrastructure developed from Zone 5’s CLEAVER and RUSTY DAGGER air-launched munition programs.  A core aspect of our manufacturing strategy involves the use of these existing, robust technologies to streamline our production process.  This method not only streamlines assembly operations, but also markedly reduces production costs, particularly as we scale.  Comprehensive digitalization of our manufacturing process streamlines operations, optimizes resource use, and substantially lowers expenses, while ensuring the highest quality production.   Combining COTS technology with high TRL technologies from existing systems, the Zone 5 solution offers a high probability of successfully meeting LCLRAD requirements.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2024). Reported award amounts total $5,907,110. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.