SBIR/STTR Research Award

KIHOMAC SUU-67/A Pylon Modification for Advanced Weapons

Award identifier a30139747f32919ac83d130688f162f3fcd11a799009fdd2166b8b8b311f3d30Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$179,969

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
KIHOMAC INC
Proposal award date
2024-07-08
Contract end date
2025-01-08
UEI
U61MKRKMVQN3
Solicitation number
24.1
Topic code
AF241-0005

Research abstract

KIHOMAC, Inc., proposes a Phase I SBIR to develop the plan to convert the SUU-67/A pylon to support larger, heavier munitions to support stand-off engagement.Ā This Phase I proposal will result in a comprehensive initial design concept to design and develop a fully modified SUU-67/A pylon in support of a Phase II prototype. Our Phase I proposal will provide the following analysis and result in a number of products to be delivered across the Phase I program period: An analysis to determine which specific system components require modification or removal (e.g., ducting, heating) to include a determination of whether the Heavy Stores Adapter Beams (HSAB) requires modification to accommodate the updated pylon.Ā This will also inform the need for an additional processor and related software/firmware elements. An initial SUU-67/A system model and digital twin developed using a model-based system engineering (MBSE) approach with SysML product outputs Initial Computer Aided Design (CAD) models from Government-provided 2D drawings and diagrams, using a Faro arm to fill in 2D drawing gaps if GFE is provided, to inform the complete TDP development in Phase II A comprehensive pathway to nuclear certification for SUU-67/A pylon The specific products will include a Final Report containing the bulk of the analysis, with separate deliverables addressing the foundational MBSE/SysML product and CAD drawings to support the Phase II TDP.Ā These deliverables will be marked by frequent engagements with the Government stakeholders in the form of Technical Interchanges and monthly progress reports. KIHOMAC is poised to support this modification. With 375 employees - nearly half with prior service experience - we bring a highly-engaged team focused on supporting aging-aircraft and sustainment work.Ā Our nation-wide team of leaders, engineers, technicians, and support staff that are committed to exactly this type of work.Ā With the experience of dozens of reverse engineering and middle-out engineering efforts that have gone into low and full rate production marked by exceptional CPARs, the experience of multiple SBIR awards, and a diverse team supported by nine locations, KIHOMAC is the low-cost, low-risk option to the SUU-67/A modification opportunity. Ā Ā

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

12 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2025). Reported award amounts total $5,525,484. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.