SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Efficiency Hybrid Turbo-Electric Propulsion Design

Award identifier f1df2863071d790897c32c1820c312f66c39546453d3d36d0b6f4074dc68a734Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$179,154

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
HODGES WILLIAM TODD
Proposal award date
2024-04-26
Contract end date
2024-10-30
UEI
ULKQK2TAGTQ3
Solicitation number
23.3
Topic code
AF233-0004

Research abstract

In a rapidly changing world, the United States Military will need to create transformative aircraft designs to ensure total air dominance over any battlefield of the future.  Transformative Air Force and DoD aircraft designs of the future will need a large amount of auxiliary power generation from a hybrid turbo-electric engine to operate inflight payloads such as radar or directed energy devices.  Dramatic transformative aircraft designs will also need to make use of a full range of aggressive, powered technologies, such as distributed propulsion and distributed aerodynamic flow control, to increase aircraft performance and mission effectiveness.  Creative Innovations For Aerospace (CIFA) has developed a hybrid turbine engine architecture and topology that has the power density, efficiency, flexibility, adaptability and power generating capability to meet the future propulsion needs of transformative aircraft designs.  This proposed hybrid turbine engine architecture and topology, CIFA Engine Architecture (CEA), is covered by U.S. patents 11,365,706, 11,506,116 and 11,619,165.  The CEA turbine engine will allow new, vastly different advanced aircraft configurations that are not possible today.  A new generation of turbine engines will also need to generate much more electrical power to operate payloads and mission enhancing equipment in the airframe that were not possible before.   As a new generation aircraft goes through different phases of a flight, different levels of auxiliary power will be needed at different locations in the airframe.  At take-off, a hybrid engine could send power to high lift devices, lift fans, or rotors.  During the cruise or loiter flight segments, the high lift systems, lift fans, or rotors could be shut down and the power rerouted to devices that will improve cruise speed and/or recharge batteries.  High powered radar or jammers or directed energy payloads could also be operated.  On landing approach, power could once again go to high lift devices, lift fans, or rotors for landing.  Any extra power needed by the high lift systems could be drawn from a small battery system for the short time needed to take off or landing.  Current turbines are not adaptable enough in their basic design and not flexible enough in their operation to generate large amounts of auxiliary power.   Turbine engines of the future will need to generate larger amounts of auxiliary power that can be used to increase aircraft performance and mission capabilities.  The CEA turbine engine does have the power density, efficiency, flexibility, adaptability and electrical power generation capability to meet the future propulsion needs of dramatically better Air Force & DOD aircraft.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.