SBIR/STTR Research Award

MHz sample delivery system for a seeded X-ray oscillator

Award identifier 0858bb70a812113812c0653eccf1e7ed519052bdff7486d7ca1de68da765aa4cAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,149,775

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RADIABEAM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Proposal award date
2024-04-01
Contract end date
2026-03-31
UEI
Q6NDLV47NBT5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003184
Topic code
C55-08a

Research abstract

The demonstration of an x-ray laser oscillator (XLO) relies on pumping a gain medium with intense x-ray pulses and generating fresh samples of medium after exposure. Prior attempts to replenish gain medium used liquid jets, but the ultimate velocity was limited. A thin solid target (25µm) can provide order of magnitude more atoms for population inversion than a liquid target and provides more consistency during experimental operations. Solid targets in rotary spindles can move at high rotation speeds for sample replenishment, yet signiSicant engineering is required to meet the requirements of a XLO system. A rapid moving spindle with a copper foil thin disk can attain high tangential speed to provide fresh samples for population inversion in the XLO scheme. At the Linac Coherent Light Source, operations in multi-bunch modalities deliver x-ray pulses separated in time by 35 ns. In order, to guarantee a fresh spot is illuminated on the copper foil, the target should have a tangential speed near 150m/s (corresponding to a 18k rpm for a 150mm disk). This sets the target performance for a rotating spindle for use in an XLO. In Phase I, we developed a physics model of the rotary spindle with copper disk, addressing timing considerations for use in the XLO experiment at the LCLS. The target speciSications were translated to engineering design goals, and a prototype target delivery system was developed. The prototype underwent signiSicant bench tests and was validated up to 20,000 rpm for a sustained period of >2 hours. Subsequent tests pushed the rotation rate to 25,000 rpm, which is far beyond necessary for the XLO demonstration. In Phase II, we will build off the results in Phase I and continue to reSine the design with simulations and conduct bench tests to further validate the design. The comprehensive package will include mechanical design and engineering of the target mounting and retention system, packaging into a testing chamber, and validation tests on the device up to the speciSied velocity. The ancillary work includes development of user-friendly controls and redundant diagnostics (thermocouples, infrared detectors, photodiodes, etc.) for in-situ monitoring of the spindle.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

190 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2025). Reported award amounts total $96,783,846. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.