SBIR/STTR Research Award

Model Level Integrated Simulation Architecture for Collaborative Development

Award identifier 01aff24c0f025b90445c16e543af5d2974de557435747e290ab1d22016728863Awarding agency Department of Defense · Missile Defense Agency

Award amount

$1,809,990

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Missile Defense Agency
Recipient company
RTSYNC CORP
Proposal award date
2022-09-14
Contract end date
2024-09-14
UEI
GKFSZDJJ1R41
Solicitation number
18.2
Topic code
MDA18-012

Research abstract

RTSync Corp. and WarpIV technologies have each performed research to evolve different and complementary aspects of a Model Level Integrated Simulation Architecture. The RTSync team, employed the Discrete Event System Specification (DEVS) formalism and the existing RTSync owned Modeling and Simulation environment (MS4 Me) to base the architecture design on a firm system theoretical and computationally supported composition framework. The resulting Collaborative Development for Model Level Integrated Simulation Architecture (CAMLI) exhibits essential properties of ease of model integration, model composability and simulation generated data collection and retrieval. WarplV’s parallel discrete-event and real-time simulation engine enables high performance execution of complex systems such as multi-stage, long-range missiles carrying multiple warheads, surface engagement, and space integrated science missions. The objectives of the proposed joint research project include to enable DEVS models constructed in CAMLI to be executed easily and efficiently on the WarpIV simulation capabilities as well as allowing such DEVS-compliant models to interoperate with WarplV independently derived components. The planned research is to characterize the class of models supported by the Warp IV simulator sufficiently to enable DEVS models to be executed on the simulator, design CAMLI integration with WarpIV, develop models/cases for WarpIV to enable testing of DEVS model execution in WarpIV, optimize the execution of DEVS models in parallel simulation and evaluate the resulting simulation performance. In addition, the objectives of the digital engineering implementation and integration research are the development of Bidirectional SysML / DEVS model mapping architecture and expansion of Model Library and V&V Meta-data capabilities previously developed. Finally, we seek to test development of relevant simulation using Bidirectional SysML / DEVS model mapping within the scope of developing a representation for use in a program of record. To do so, we will leverage modeling experience derived from support of the United States Space Force (USSF) Test and Evaluation digital engineering initiative. Approved for Public Release | 22-MDA-11339 (13 Dec 22)

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

15 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2014–2025). Reported award amounts total $10,885,103. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.