SBIR/STTR Research Award

Para-DEVS: Paratemporal Simulation with Uncertainty Quantification

Award identifier 4eca505eeea4d9b8d9b229a5dc9cbaeaff10a24d38d7b0943b9db2c9d2c90922Awarding agency Department of Defense · Missile Defense Agency

Award amount

$1,509,946

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Missile Defense Agency
Recipient company
RTSYNC CORP
Proposal award date
2024-01-26
Contract end date
2026-01-25
UEI
GKFSZDJJ1R41
Solicitation number
22.B
Topic code
MDA22-T001

Research abstract

The specific shortfall addressed in Phase I was recognition of the need by system developers for more powerful pre-implementation testing Modeling and Simulation (M&S) paradigms. To do so, a computational framework is needed to identify, characterize, propagate, analyze and reduce uncertainties in models when considered over large spans of their buildable technology spaces. Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) methods aim to provide objective confidence measurement in M&S-based predictions of performance metrics produced by stochastic simulations for which the underlying probability distributions may not be fully known or even knowable. Phase I explored paratemporal techniques in which simulations are spawned for possible branchings until successive downstream branching points are reached and the process is repeated until a satisfactory level of confidence in outcome distribution has been attained. In Phase II we seek to formalize and extend paratemporal and cloning simulation techniques that were investigated in Phase I. We seek to overcome two major hurdles to implement such techniques: Scalability, the ability to manage the combinatorial explosion of branching arising from multiple choice points, and configurability, the ability to configure newly, or reconfigure conventionally, designed M&S artifacts to enable underlying simulators to support paratemporal execution. The proposed solution exploits RTSyncÆs unique M&S capabilities based on the Discrete Event System Specification (DEVS) formalism which offers the ideal M&S framework to address the scalability challenge. Moreover, such development will occur in the environment of RTSyncÆs support of collaborative development of DEVS models for reusability and composability. The goal of Phase II is to develop a full prototype capability based on the proof-of-concept established in Phase I with the intent of testing the prototype through experimentation in government M&S labs. Prototype level user and design documentation will be developed and will facilitate cyber security approval for loading the prototype software on government computer systems through cyber aware design decisions and development of cyber security artifacts. Approved for Public Release | 24-MDA-11673 (8 Jan 24)

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

15 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2014–2025). Reported award amounts total $10,885,103. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.