SBIR/STTR Research Award

Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Substrate

Award identifier d72c0092e6b5b39c0112e76d5bd6df4331c65e86f9d042eacb521bfe0bf6e4a2Awarding agency Department of Defense · Office for Chemical and Biological Defense

Award amount

$165,415

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Office for Chemical and Biological Defense
Recipient company
LYNNTECH INC.
Proposal award date
2022-04-04
Contract end date
2022-10-03
UEI
PMVAL8J63516
Solicitation number
21.3
Topic code
CBD213-001

Research abstract

Raman spectroscopy has proven to be a reliable field deployable detection technique for assessing chemical threats, including chemical warfare agents, energetic materials, and illicit narcotics. Military and Homeland Security agencies commonly utilize various portable Raman systems in sensitive site exploitation, checkpoint scenarios, and to determine hazardous content on surfaces or containers. Enhanced Raman techniques, such as surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) have been demonstrated to be a vibrant field of research that is growing significantly in scope and applicability while pushing at the ultimate limits of sensitivity. SERS occurs when nanometallic substrates locally amplify electromagnetic fields at or near particle surfaces providing enhancements over 'normal' Raman spectroscopy, typically over a million-fold. Along with other advantages such as reduction of interfering fluorescence, decreased detection times, and reduction of laser power required for analysis, SERS has been positioned to be an ideal technique for low-level, low-consumable detection schemes, while aiming towards miniaturization of instrumentation. The problem to date, however, is the lack of commercially available robust SERS active substrates that have an inherent low background signature which ultimately interferes with obtaining clean SERS spectra from low-level concentrations of threat analytes, while still having at least 104 SERS enhancement. Klarite substrates with nanometer scale patterning of a silicon surface coated with gold had very low background signature and produced repeatable results. However, the Klarite substrates were very expensive and are no longer commercially available. To address the critical need, Lynntech is proposing to develop SERS substrates with nanostructured metal (gold or silver) with low background signature and with at least 104 SERS enhancement using a low-cost scalable process. The SERS substrate will be individually packaged to enable safe storage across broad range of environments.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,079 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2025). Reported award amounts total $327,411,388. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.