SBIR/STTR Research Award

Variable Wedge Degrader for Rare Isotope Beams

Award identifier 6f03660a18cbbfd25d417fcac4f127c16db1b160876290a3a8b2e7e47342a2cdAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,612

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RADIABEAM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Proposal award date
2022-02-14
Contract end date
2022-11-13
UEI
Q6NDLV47NBT5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C53-34e

Research abstract

Facilities that generate rare isotope beams employ fragment separators for various ion species. The ion-optical system consists of energy dispersive media to purify the specific beam. The purifier is shaped in a wedge and reduces the beam energy via atomic interactions. The wedge requires high degree of precision in angle and thickness tolerances. Additionally, selecting different beams often requires swapping the wedge, which is a time-consuming process that takes away from beam time to users. In this proposal, we will develop a variable wedge purifier for use in fragment separation at rare isotope beam facilities. The wedge will be tapered from sub-mm to many mm in thickness, over a relatively long distance. The insertion of the wedge into the beam allows the beam to sample various thicknesses, thereby allowing selection of different energy isotope beams, without the need to swap out wedges for different experiments. The Phase I efforts are focused on fabrication of a high-quality wedge, the key component of the system. The fabrication methods employed include standard machining techniques, using a wire electric discharge machining method to achieve the appropriate dimensions, and an iterative lapping procedure complemented with high-precision optical metrology for inspection. In addition, a two-metal wedge fabrication that may relax the given tolerances will also be tested. Finally, a novel supersonic gas jet as an energy degrader will be studied, which can effectively replace the solid metal wedge, where the variable density of the jet is used to select different beam energy. The advantage of a gas jet is that there is no damage and does not require constant maintenance, however implementation requires design of a differential pumping system. Additional work includes engineering design on remote control manipulation and custom cooling solution for high power beam locations. The results of these efforts can provide immediate benefits for facilities that generate rare isotopes and will expedite beam selection by reducing downtime associated with replacement. In addition, the technology developed is directly applicable in the enhancement of commercial medical accelerators that require purified beams for targeted dose delivery.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

190 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2025). Reported award amounts total $96,783,846. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.