SBIR/STTR Research Award

Ferrite-free circulator for precise measurements of SRF cavities with high Q-factor

Award identifier 12cbba5bf3632d3b58237c2e9d61c9c106782112a54d65e9ce943d6fb593f95eAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,708

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RADIABEAM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Proposal award date
2022-02-14
Contract end date
2022-11-13
UEI
Q6NDLV47NBT5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002554
Topic code
C53-34a

Research abstract

Superconducting radio frequency (SRF) accelerators at modern scientific facilities require operation in the continuous wave regime at accelerating gradients of up to 20 MV/m. This can be achieved with SRF resonators with quality factors as high as 1e11. Such high-Q cavities require a new generation of instruments for precise measurement of their RF properties, especially in the over-coupled regime. Currently the measurement precision is limited by ferrite-based circulators, as the ferrite’s material properties vary in response to the environment. Eliminating ferrite can lead to a major improvement in the circulator’s performance and accuracy of its applications. We propose to exploit optical non-linearities, realized via an asymmetric Fano resonance coupled to the Lorentzian resonance. This approach allows to surpass the fundamental restriction of non- linearity and forward transmission, where one of these properties must be sacrificed in favor of the other. In order to allow this device to work in the regime with reflected power present, we will utilize an approach based on time variation of the resonant frequencies of three resonators connected in a way to form a 3-port system. In Phase I we will perform numerical RF design and optimization of the 2- and 3-port non- reciprocal devices and demonstrate operation as an isolator. Then we will perform an experimental demonstration of non-reciprocity by fabricating a PCB prototype and measuring the S-parameters of a 3-port circulator. In Phase II, we plan to optimize the circulator’s parameters, build a full- scale prototype and test it with an actual high-Q-factor SRF cavity to demonstrate the targeted accuracy. The developed high precision diagnostic system will be a strong contender for measuring the next generation of very high Q superconducting cavities and will find application in a number of large DOE projects. The circulator can be broadly used in microwave technologies outside of accelerator applications. In addition, the proposed device can be used in quantum computer readout interfaces.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

190 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2025). Reported award amounts total $96,783,846. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.