SBIR/STTR Research Award

Packaged Mid-Infrared Non-Mechanical Beam Steerer

Award identifier dcfdc96d669a1bc028997084887c35523c0e842b1a06317fd6ef57b087eeebf0Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$239,790

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Kent Optronics, Inc.
Proposal award date
2021-07-01
Contract end date
2022-09-07
UEI
D6M2SL1TEZK3
Solicitation number
21.1
Topic code
N211-005

Research abstract

In this SBIR Phase I proposal, Kent Optronics proposes to design, develop and mature a packaged, high-throughput, non-mechanical beam steering (NMBS) device that is able to maintain stable operation with multiple-wavelength laser sources in the 2-5mm midwave infrared (MWIR) band with wide steering angle of 30° (horizontal) ´ 5° (vertical), fast speed of 1 kHz, high beam quality of M2>1.5, high efficiency >50%, and high optical power on target of >10W. The NMBS technology is based on the liquid crystal waveguide 2-dimensional beam steering device developed by the NRL group with the principle proposed by Vescent Photonics. The ultimate goal is to achieve and deliver a fully functional MWIR NMBS package with technology readiness level (TRL)³8/9 that can be mass-produced with manufacturing readiness level (MRL)³7 in five (5) years after the project starts. Phase I efforts are to design, develop, and demonstrate feasibility of the refractive NMBS device in MWIR with improved optical performance and the MRL assessment. In Phase II, fully packaged NMBS prototype will be developed, qualified and delivered, reach TRL>6 and MRL³5. In this SBIR Phase I proposal, Kent Optronics proposes to design, develop and mature a packaged, high-throughput, non-mechanical beam steering (NMBS) device that is able to maintain stable operation with multiple-wavelength laser sources in the 2-5mm midwave infrared (MWIR) band with wide steering angle of 30° (horizontal) ´ 5° (vertical), fast speed of 1 kHz, high beam quality of M2>1.5, high efficiency >50%, and high optical power on target of >10W. The NMBS technology is based on the liquid crystal waveguide 2-dimensional beam steering device developed by the NRL group with the principle proposed by Vescent Photonics. The ultimate goal is to achieve and deliver a fully functional MWIR NMBS package with technology readiness level (TRL)³8/9 that can be mass-produced with manufacturing readiness level (MRL)³7 in five (5) years after the project starts. Phase I efforts are to design, develop, and demonstrate feasibility of the refractive NMBS device in MWIR with improved optical performance and the MRL assessment. In Phase II, fully packaged NMBS prototype will be developed, qualified and delivered, reach TRL>6 and MRL³5.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

65 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2025). Reported award amounts total $23,387,395. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.