SBIR/STTR Research Award

gATO for Operational Technology Environments

Award identifier 2643b2d51c854a5e71cb2400d53821e096bf6d0b95a01c4042db08201afd876dAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,249,844

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2026

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
CORSHA, INC
Proposal award date
2025-10-28
Contract end date
2026-10-31
UEI
MM9YAUMKKJ95
Solicitation number
25.4
Topic code
AF254-D0832

Research abstract

The Organic Industrial Base (OIB) and other Operational Technology (OT) modernization initiatives across the USAF, DLA, Army, and other services have changed the way Industrial Networks need to operate. Today legacy operational systems and critical infrastructure are increasingly connected and automated and need to interact with modern technologies like AI, AR/VR, and wireless and these legacy systems weren’t developed with cybersecurity controls in mind. This convergence of legacy and modern systems in hybrid operational environments, the wide range of mission impact, and the gaps for understanding these connected operational systems require a new blueprint for continually assessing and managing the risk in these highly integrated environments and an opportunity to incorporate this risk calculus into real-time identity and access management strategies for operational systems and critical infrastructure. Key Drivers for gATO in Operational Environments1.             Enhanced Guidance of System Categorization for ATOs and other accreditations2.             Standards-based OT Security Controls Selection and Overlays3.             Generative AI-guided artifact generation  4.             Automated Continuous Assessment to Reduce Recertification Time The ATO process for the Department of Defense is often the most costly and time-consuming blocker to delivering new systems to the mission and even worse for less understand operational systems and critical infrastructure. While the DoD and NIST has recently invested to address OT specific security and risk concerns, the ATO process is largely manual and can take upwards of 18+ months to get even a small operational enclave of 4-5 systems accredited.  Today the DoD lacks the ability to ensure critical infrastructure meets DoD ATO requirements for Operational Technology/Systems resulting inIncreased vulnerability to cyber attacksLimited technology adoption and advancement in OT domains Slowdown in rapid, trustworthy capability delivery to the warfighter. The goal of Corsha’s gATO initiative is to utilize generative artificial intelligence (AI) and model-based system engineering (MBSE) to accelerate and standardize ATO package creation and approval for OT systems and enclaves, and, in turn, improve the security and speed of technology adoption for critical hybrid OT to IT convergence.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

10 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2026). Reported award amounts total $7,902,086. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.