SBIR/STTR Research Award

OASES: Open Autonomy/Safety Enhancement System

Award identifier 1be6db8aaf6559871cfa0c3f83b0248e6ce6c31973608d0ec049a7103dccc5ddAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,967

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC.
Proposal award date
2020-12-16
Contract end date
2021-06-16
UEI
C12TQVKF5413
Solicitation number
X20.D
Topic code
AFX20D-TCSO1

Research abstract

Vertical Take-off and Landing (VTOL), Advanced Air Mobility (AAM), and Agility Prime operations will require advanced autonomy and perception capabilities to ensure reduced operator workload and operating costs, and enable future unmanned operations. In fact, in many instances, the move towards unmanned operations is key to the business case for longer term eVTOL commercial operations. Before these Unmanned Air Systems (UAS) are able to carry out missions in civilian environments they will need to demonstrate safe and reliable take-off, navigation, collision avoidance, and landing capabilities. Over the past few years, Scientific Systems Company, Inc. (SSCI) has been developing a system to address very similar challenges for the Navy’s MQ-8 Fire Scout VTOL UAS. Over the course of this STTR effort, SSCI will partner with Brigham Young University (BYU), to build on existing autonomy and perception capabilities to develop OASES (Open Autonomy/Safety Enhancement System), an integrated safety package that can be customized and installed on any DoD or commercial UAS to support safe and reliable autonomous missions. During the STTR Phase I period, SSCI and BYU will build on existing capabilities for collision threat detection and obstacle avoidance to design a multi-faceted OASES sense-and-avoid strategy for the disparate flight conditions that are expected to be encountered in AAM operations due to the versatility of modern (e)VTOL aircraft.  In the Phase II effort, the team will adapt SSCI’s existing INAV-SL ship-board recovery technology to develop the OASES precision landing component. SSCI and BYU expect to partner with commercial UAS vendors to perform a preliminary demonstration of the OASES collision avoidance and landing capabilities in Phase II. In Phase III, SSCI and BYU will work with commercial UAS/eVTOL vendors to develop versions of the OASES integrated safety package that can be integrated with their platforms. SSCI anticipates adding GPS-denied navigation capabilities, based on SSCI’s ImageNav technology, to the OASES integrated safety package in Phase III.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

464 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $186,567,405. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.