SBIR/STTR Research Award

Next-Generation Rechargeable Zn Batteries for Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing (eVTOL) Aircraft

Award identifier 872910ae680a1961e4d0029d7c52fcb3894b9059478b4426b94f154fa88f97c9Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,964

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
LYNNTECH INC.
Proposal award date
2020-11-20
Contract end date
2021-05-15
UEI
PMVAL8J63516
Solicitation number
X20.D
Topic code
AFX20D-TCSO1

Research abstract

Rechargeable batteries with high specific energy and power, long cycle life, and high safety are needed to enable the emerging Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing/Urban Air Mobility (eVTOL/UAM) market for potential disaster response, humanitarian aid, and logistics missions. Rechargeable zinc-air batteries (ZABs) are listed as a promising candidate in the battery market, owing to their advantages in terms of environmental friendliness, abundance of the constituent elements, and safe operation. Especially Zn is highlighted as a high-capacity, sustainable, cost-efficient, and recyclable material. ZABs may achieve gravimetric and volumetric energy densities of 500 Wh/kgcell and 1400 Wh/Lcell (based on the practical attainable values of commercially available primary ZABs in coin cell format), which is by good approximation twice as much as today’s commercialized Li-ion batteries (350 Wh/kgcell and 810 Wh/Lcell). Rechargeable ZABs are, however, not yet realized in practice despite 50 years of intensive research because of two major degradation phenomena: (i) the fast degradation of the cathode materials such as catalyst, binder, or carbon additive and (ii) the morphological changes of the Zn anode during repeated cycling, leading to an irreversible deformation of the entire anode. Lynntech proposes to develop next-generation high performance and cost-effective rechargeable ZABs based on the combination of an advanced rechargeable Zn anode developed by Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech.), and a bifunctional holey graphene-based cathode developed by Lynntech, as well as a salt-in-water electrolyte. During the Phase I, Lynntech, in collaboration with Georgia Tech., will fabricate and test lab-scale next-generation ZAB cells. During the Phase II, Lynntech will work with Georgia Tech. and a battery manufacturer to further improve the electrodes and electrolytes as well as battery design. We will fabricate and demonstrate prototype rechargeable ZABs. High energy, high power, and long cycle life ZABs have tremendous market opportunities for both Air Force/DoD and commercial applications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,079 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2025). Reported award amounts total $327,411,388. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.