SBIR/STTR Research Award

Improved Reactor and Catalyst for Light Alkanes to Olefins and Liquid Fuels

Award identifier a59fdacbc5ef5ec8dc11ee3e7f75961606de97b7f9031f8c8023e41bad5de9c6Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,049,901

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
PRECISION COMBUSTION, INC.
Proposal award date
2020-04-06
Contract end date
2022-04-05
UEI
KHBYLJYZAJP3
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002155
Topic code
22a

Research abstract

Natural gas is typically delivered from a gas well to an end-user via a pipeline system. When pipeline infrastructure is not available, the gas is either compressed or liquefied for storage and transport or flared. Often distribution of remote natural gas or use of it for power production cannot be economically justified. This type of gas reserve is typically considered as stranded natural gas and represents billions of dollars in unutilized assets. One approach to utilize these gases is to convert them to high energy density liquid hydrocarbons. A compact GTL process can be deployed at the well head but must overcome product yield and economic issues related to use of extremely small-scale processing equipment. Precision Combustion, Inc. (PCI) addresses these issues through development of high yield processing technology taking advantage of novel catalysts for the conversion of ethane into intermediates, which are then upgrading to liquid transportation fuels. Phase I showed highest reported to date performance for GTL-intermediate catalyst, enabling a lower energy pathway to olefins and a corresponding lower cost path to liquid hydrocarbon fuels. PCI showed that the GTL reactor and catalysts enables product yields higher than any previously reported, 64% vs. 40%, minimizes side reactions, and enables economically viable production of liquid transportation fuels for small, 1 MMSCF/day natural gas wells (w/10% ethane) to potentially very large installations. PCI shows that a ~35% reduction in energy consumption for ethylene production alone is possible by shifting manufacturing from the industrially important but highly endothermic ethane steam cracking to our novel exothermic process. Phase II will further optimize the reactor and catalyst for yields and costs needed to reach $3/gallon gasoline target, using a combination of experimental studies, reaction rate, reactor, and process modeling, and techno-economic assessments. The process is applicable to remote, stranded or excess natural gas, as well for GTL applications, as well as to facilities looking to reduce costs of olefin manufacturing.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

201 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2025). Reported award amounts total $70,053,268. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.