SBIR/STTR Research Award

Gas sheet monitor diagnositc for intense charged particle beams

Award identifier d8dd04147dafe294e8bb1e2b00cfbda76ab5a57c3e98d5928bee339b983a0481Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$999,517

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RADIABEAM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Proposal award date
2020-04-06
Contract end date
2022-04-05
UEI
Q6NDLV47NBT5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002155
Topic code
09a

Research abstract

Accelerators for light sources, and high-energy physics, require non-destructive and non- interceptive diagnostics for measuring beam profiles. Typical diagnostics based on solid materials or reflectors will not withstand high intensities and pose potential for radiation damage. In this proposal, we investigate the use of a tailored gas sheet distribution to supplant traditional metal foils. As the particle beam interacts with the gas sheet, ionization products are generated, and transported via an electrostatic column, to an imaging detector. The ion distribution at the detector plane has a direct correlation to the transverse profile in the particle beam. The approach does not disturb the particle beam and is modular and scalable to different beam facilities. In Phase I, a scalable start-to-end simulation suite that models the interaction and output of the diagnostic was developed. The approach was used to model test cases for facilities at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. The toolkit includes detailed simulations on the fluid dynamics of generating a thin gas sheet at the interaction region and specifying the differential pumping requirements to maintain adequate vacuum levels. The studies also include ionization of neutral gas by relativistic beams, and design of the electrostatic column. Detailed engineering on key subcomponents was performed to identify potential bottlenecks in prototyping. The Phase II efforts are focused on realizing a gas-sheet view-screen. The efforts include optimization of the system for facility size constraints, and engineering and fabricating key custom components such as the interaction chamber, the gas shaping nozzles, the electrostatic column, and the gas evacuation section. The end result will be a prototype diagnostic that is deployed to the accelerator and commissioned with live beam. The results of these efforts can provide immediate benefits for accelerators for light source facilities and high-energy physics that require high resolution characterization of beams in a non- invasive manner. The design is flexible and will find use in many different facilities.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

190 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2025). Reported award amounts total $96,783,846. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.