SBIR/STTR Research Award

New Coulometry Technique for Li-ion Battery Durability Analysis

Award identifier 7203cbc7731789a2b47a6a187fcda6dc85e36bb93ee8a25a49d61c0b259e490eAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,050,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
XILECTRIC INC
Proposal award date
2019-08-19
Contract end date
2021-08-18
UEI
L3HVFXWNWC81
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001976
Topic code
13a

Research abstract

Large Li-ion factories are being built around the world in an attempt to dramatically lower cost through economies of scale.At the same time, new market opportunities are becoming accessible to Li-ion as the technology improves.For many of these technologies, the levelized cost of energy storage is the primary metric, not $/kWh.Cycle life varies tremendously depending on cycling conditions, chemistry, cell design, and manufacturing quality.Cell manufacturers and storage integrators are very interested in new technologies that can improve the abuse tolerance of Li-ion batteries resulting in improved cycle life.But proving new technologies or even iterating on existing formulations is challenging given that under some load profiles Li-ion chemistries can cycle for many years.Such long evaluation timeframes are not conducive to technical advancement.New characterization techniques are required that provide rapid insight on capacity loss and degradation mechanisms with sufficient clarity to make informed design decisions.This project will develop a new battery characterization tool that allows the measuring of capacity loss rates of Li-ion batteries under a variety of specific use scenarios.Xilectric’s proposed characterization technique provides insights not available from existing techniques providing a more complete picture of the capabilities of the variant of Li-ion chemistry under test.In particular, our technique is able to provide several measures of fidelity under realistic cycling conditions while avoiding artificial accelerated aging conditions such as extreme temperatures and potentials as well as full depth of discharge cycling.The information provided by the new test can be used to develop better battery management algorithms, to improve on cell design, and to select Li-ion formulations best suited to the end-user application.In Phase I, the basic performance requirements of the new coulometer system were established.Several batteries were characterized with the new technique.In phase II, the full system will be prototyped.Once validated, Xilectric would expect strong commercial interest in the new device from various Li-ion cell manufacturers, end-users, researchers, and academic institutions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

11 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2024). Reported award amounts total $8,521,063. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.