SBIR/STTR Research Award

Compact Cryomodule for Stand-alone SRF Accelerators

Award identifier 9ee1245bf0c7241db8898519d908bee73753f34960390d3e3b7097293f544059Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,664

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RADIABEAM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Proposal award date
2019-07-01
Contract end date
2020-03-31
UEI
Q6NDLV47NBT5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001941
Topic code
29c

Research abstract

SRF cavities are starting to be recognized as not only research devices but as devices that might be able to step in as an improved and cost-efficient alternative to the existing room temperature high average power industrial accelerators. The largest issue in fostering this change in applicable areas is the cost of the infrastructure and cytotechnology required when maintaining cryo-liquids. The bulky cryoplants are presently synonymous with the SRF accelerator technology, thus limiting people’s perception and therefore undermining commercial potential of the SRF accelerators. Although, to reverse such perception, few smaller cryomodules have already been developed, as a rule these projects have not invested in the level of analysis required for field deployment, instead focusing on building these delicate devices at their final test locations. RadiaBeam Technologies proposes to design and build a cryomodule that operates without any cryo-liquids utilizing cryocoolers and conductive cooling. Removing the large expense of cryo- fluids also reduces transportation concerns since the cryomodule becomes just a vacuum device, and not a potentially high-pressure vessel. Further, RadiaBeam will implement the necessary analysis to make such cryomodules consistent with the deployment on a mobile platform. In Phase I, the cryomodule design and analysis will be fostered to an advanced concept to be presented for phase II fabrication. This will include the necessary thermal, structural, and magnetic shielding analysis. We will further perform ancillary component research and selection of the cryocooler, compressors and a closed loop chiller needed for final deployment.This device would have immediate benefit to existing SRF facilities now as an independent module utilized for capability expansion. This product would also address the desire of fostering compact SRF technology into industry and small laboratories. Some examples of typical areas of interest that would apply are: cargo inspection and security, food irradiation, bulk material treatment, and environmental issues such as waste water treatment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

190 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2025). Reported award amounts total $96,783,846. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.