SBIR/STTR Research Award

Enhanced Electronic Interconnects using ZTACH ACA:No Pressure, Low-Temperature, Self-Assembly Material Process

Award identifier 9e98e01d523d19f88abc301721be78ba2705a3de3429176ab88ec2ad32c17d22Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,000,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SUNRAY SCIENTIFIC INC.
Proposal award date
2018-08-27
Contract end date
2020-08-26
UEI
PZPHRDAUMF19
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001795
Topic code
27e

Research abstract

Upcoming HEP projects require physical and electrical bonds between opposite points of thin parallel circuit faces which areless than 50 microns in pitch, but current methods, such as bump-soldering and anisotropic conductive adhesives (ACA) and films (ACF) cannot reach these resolution limits and furthermore require heat and pressure that damage delicate circuitry. SunRay ZTACH™ is an anisotropic conductive adhesive that, in a magnetic field, self-assembles into columns of sub-micron ferromagnetic particles that connect opposing circuit faces and which can be cured at low temperature or even ultraviolet light while requiring no pressure, but rather creating protective structural support between the circuits. During Phase I, SunRay Scientific partnered with Stanford SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Rochester Institute of Technology to fabricate wafers with a range of features and connection radii, assemble the fabricated devices using ZTACH™, and conduct electrical and reliability testing SLAC was responsible for fabricating the wafers and performing conduction and resistance tests across the connections. SunRay Scientific was responsible for the assembly of the devices and researchers at the Rochester Institute of Technology performed sheer tests and temperature-humidity tests upon the samples and quantified the internal structure of the conductive columns using electron microscopy. Phase II research will build upon the Phase I results by refining the proof-of-principle success at greater than 100µm pitch and pursuing those methods to achieve 50 µm pitch and lower. During the process developments, material development and reliability studies, the team will ensure compatibility with damage modes specifically related to HEP environments. The final goal is to scale production volume to a rate sufficient to support Phase III prototype orders from customers we have identified during Phase I. Phase III benefits of a commercial product include environmentally-friendly manufacturing, smaller/cheaper/faster electrical devices, new classes of products, healthcare innovations, lighter aeronautic and space equipment, and employment opportunities for new technology and research fields.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

20 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2024). Reported award amounts total $8,841,829. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.