SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Fast Spectrum Neutron Source for Materials Irradiation using a Superconducting Electron Linac

Award identifier 5a2581ecdfbf19d4a0e7b26e23041022f45bc03fe48ff5835adfc0cfbafe6427Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,500,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Niowave, Inc.
Proposal award date
2015-04-06
Contract end date
2017-04-05
UEI
WJLJSN2AT8P1
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001193
Topic code
16d

Research abstract

Next generation reactor concepts have a common goal of providing safer, longer lasting and economically viable nuclear power plants. Developing radiation damage resistant materials for both in-core and out-of core applications is a critical component of these next generation power plants. Testing these novel materials requires an intense neutron setting. A commonly used tool for testing novel materials is a high flux fast neutron environment. Fission-like spectrum neutrons are currently generated at either a nuclear reactor or a national laboratory scale accelerator such as the proposed Material Test Station at Los Alamos National Lab (using a 800 MeV proton beam). However, there are currently no fast-neutron reactors in the United States, and MTS will not be operational in the near future. We propose a convenient and low-cost alternative: an intense source of fast fission-spectrum neutrons produced from a superconducting electron linac. The proposed source is based on the photo production of neutrons, including (,n), fission, and neutron-induced fission, using a 40 MeV electron beam with power of up to 100 kW. This accelerator energy and power level is within the capabilities of superconducting linacs under development at Niowave. In a parallel project independent to this proposal, Niowave is currently building a radioisotope production facility using a 40 MeV, 100 kW superconducting electron linac. Construction of the facility began in 2014, and the facility will be operational in 2015. The proposed fast neutron source will utilize the same linac as the isotope production station. However, a beamline switchyard will direct the beam between the two endstations: one for isotope production, another is for material irradiations. This SBIR includes the design, optimization and licensing aspects of the fast neutron source. Because a majority of the development is already underway with the isotope production facility, our intent is to have the proposed commercial fast neutron source operational by the completion of Phase II. Phase III of this proposal will commercialize the technology to build dedicated material testing systems and make them available as a commercial product.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

58 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2020). Reported award amounts total $27,594,609. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.