SBIR/STTR Research Award

Modular Laser Communications Package

Award identifier 02273a51d37cd70040a653ddc6f80f6154d3db58077a08a8218b7f5f13caf3bdAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,882,973

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
X-lumin
Proposal award date
2025-09-08
Contract end date
2027-01-08
UEI
QQSGWNVU3KP4
Solicitation number
24.3
Topic code
SF243-D015

Research abstract

We propose a modular laser communications package that is compatible with a wide range of commercial astronomical telescopes.  This package would bolt onto the Nasmyth or Cassegrain focus of the primary telescope. No other modifications are necessary. By adding this package to an unmodified 0.5 m to 1.0 m aperture astronomical telescope,  the telescope is converted into a fully functioning Laser Communications Ground Terminal (LGT).  The bolt-on package (Optics Head) would contain both the transmit and receive optics in a shared aperture configuration, capable of linking with an SDA 3.1 / 4.0  capable LEO satellite terminal.  The user data is transmitted to and from the Optics Head via optical fiber.  The user data interface is a 19in rack mount chassis that also contains all the photonics and amplifiers required by the LGT.  When the package is used with a 0.7 m aperture or larger telescope, then the LGT is capable of communicating with satellites in MEO and GEO orbits. The system comes with an SDA compatible modem, but it is modem agnostic and comes with a fiber optics switching system allowing remote selection of user supplied 1550 nm based optical modems, based on which satellite is being tracked.  The two components: the Optics Head and the Chassis, are controlled using a commercial software package. This package provides remote control of all alignment, calibration, and operation of the LGT, including operation of the telescope and dome.   The software includes advanced Pointing Acquisition, and Tracking algorithms that allow stock astronomical telescopes control systems to track to the accuracies required for bi-directional ground to space laser communication. Advanced metric calibration algorithms allow this package to be used for transportable telescope systems.  The system is designed to be installed by two people in less than a day, with no special tools. Finally, the system is designed with upgrading in mind, these upgrades include: the addition of an Inertial Navigation System for shipboard operation, and operation with high bandwidth (100 Gbps) coherent detection modems.  This is a dual use system, designed to support R&D related to the Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture (PWSA) as well as university laser communicaitons programs.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2024–2025). Reported award amounts total $3,106,517. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.