SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Intensity X-Ray Sources to Eliminate High Activity Isotopes used for Sterilization

Award identifier acc369b5651ab896d28872d81f5f2ea0583dff3ed2b78900b576b0e48bbd57b5Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Niowave, Inc.
Proposal award date
2014-02-18
Contract end date
2014-11-17
UEI
WJLJSN2AT8P1
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000969
Topic code
22d

Research abstract

Three different modalities of radiation sterilization currently exist: gamma-ray sterilization, electron beam sterilization, and x-ray sterilization. One of the most common ways to sterilize goods is with gamma producing radioactive sources, most commonly Co-60 and Cs-137. Long-term possession of these sources is undesirable due to security concerns, Nuclear Regulatory Commission oversight, and rising replacement, storage, and disposal costs. In addition, gamma sterilization typically requires relatively long exposure times to achieve dosages necessary for effective sterilization. We propose to develop a radiation sterilization system which uses a superconducting linear accelerator (linac) to provide high radiation doses and thus eliminate disadvantages of utilizing Co-60 and Cs-137 sources. Electron linacs offer many advantages over radioactive sources. First, they can produce high energy bremsstrahlung x-rays by striking a metal converter on demand and can easily be turned on and off. Second, linacs can produce radiation of varying intensity, photon energy and power. Third, a bremsstrahlung photon cone is focused, compared with isotropic radiation of sources and thus is more efficient. Finally, linacs produce little radioactive waste, and they are a low security risk. These positive factors make linacs a compelling option when choosing among radiation sterilization methods. Niowave has been developing superconducting linacs for nearly a decade. Superconducting linacs produce a continuous wave electron beam and can operate nonstop at 100% duty cycle. The resulting electron beam has high average current, with a low peak current. Properly collimated, a superconducting linac can generate a high energy (well over the 10 MeV typical for sterilization), with a high flux (up to 1017 photons/cm2 per second) planar beam profile, eliminating the need for swept beam irradiation. Recent advances in superconducting accelerator technology have reduced the capital and operational costs to the point they are now competitive with conventional (normal conducting) linacs. These advances make high-dose, high-throughput bulk sterilization possible at a relatively low cost. Thus, the proposed sterilization machine can eliminate the need for high activity sources, which could be the source for a dirty bomb if these sources fell into the wrong hands.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

58 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2020). Reported award amounts total $27,594,609. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.