SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Energy Density VB2/Air Batteries for Long Endurance UAVs

Award identifier 490c068e11de60a76b15d45dc9e59184184fb6f2aecd573c5027a0a8dc3b325fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,996

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
LYNNTECH INC.
Proposal award date
2013-05-24
Contract end date
2015-05-24
UEI
PMVAL8J63516
Solicitation number
2011.2
Topic code
AF112-127

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: To provide longer operating time and reduced weight power supplies for military platforms including unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and solider communication devices, transformative advances are needed to increase the electrochemical energy storage density of batteries. The energy densities of current batteries are restricted by their utilization of predominantly single electron per molecular site charge storage processes. Vanadium diboride (VB2) undergoes an extraordinary 11 electron per molecule electrochemical oxidation process. Coupling this anode with a high capacity air cathode provides VB2-air batteries that have a theoretical volumetric energy density greater than that of gasoline. During the Phase I, Lynntech demonstrated VB2-air batteries with high capacities and rate capabilities. The Phase II project involves developing VB2-air batteries which have practical anode thicknesses and which provide current densities and capacities needed for military applications. Specific work in the Phase II involves optimization of the material, development of thick, high performance VB2 electrodes, cell performance testing, and evaluation of cell performance under simulated conditions. The development of VB2-air cells can provide batteries with significantly longer operation time and/or reduced weight compared to existing batteries. BENEFIT: High energy density VB2-air batteries have significant commercial potential based on their substantially higher energy densities compared with current primary and rechargreable batteries. Specific benefits for DoD include extended duration unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flight times, reduced carry weight for soldiers, and extended duration sensors. The battery has a dual use for both military and civilian applications. Military applications include UAVs, soldier power, communication systems, weapons systems, remote sensors, and surveillance systems. Private sector applications for Lynntech"s VB2-air batteries include consumer hearing aids, long endurance sensors, and a broad range of consumer electronic devices.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,079 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2025). Reported award amounts total $327,411,388. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.