SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel Coating Materials for RF Windows

Award identifier 89a7e8d2e4624a25f5056a5cbf7ca0a4b3164725f03043722a095b3366d5629aAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,000,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
NOKOMIS INC
Proposal award date
2011-08-15
Contract end date
2013-08-14
UEI
YAPUZLNJ1856
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000508
Topic code
14 e

Research abstract

The multipactor effect is a major challenge that is encountered in a number of areas involving high-power radio frequency or microwave systems. Particle accelerator systems associated with high energy physics research are limited by radio frequency window breakdown largely due to multipaction. The multipactor effect is highly dependent on the secondary electron coefficient of the window, which is highly surface sensitive. In this effort, recent developments in coating technologies are leveraged to integrate coating materials with extremely low secondary electron emission rates, allowing systems to perform at higher power with increased dependability. The Phase I research focused on two areas. First, exploring challenges associated with integration of the coating material with suitable radio frequency window bulk ceramics (e.g., Al2O3), and second, demonstrating that the coating material does in fact suppress secondary electron yield even at nanoscale thicknesses. For the former, coating recipes were developed during the Phase I that will be of value during follow-on efforts. For the latter, the Phase I successfully demonstrated an extreme degree of secondary electron yield suppression after application of nanometer-scale coatings. The goals of the planned Phase II are to make direct measurements comparing the coating performance against competing options, such as Titanium Nitride (TiN), to produce a prototype coated window and to test the prototype window at high power. A significant portion of global research in physics is based on data produced at the few major particle accelerator laboratories located around the world. These key facilities would see major benefits in terms of producing higher accelerator energies, decreasing the number of klystrons required for energy input, or reducing bottom line project costs, each of which results in the availability of more and better data for analysis by the many interested research institutions. Beyond that, the particle accelerator industry includes a wide range of medical, research, and security applications that would benefit from improved window performance and reliability.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

123 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2025). Reported award amounts total $66,765,345. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.