SBIR/STTR Research Award

Force Cueing Technology Integration and Feedback Metrics to Improve DMO Simulator Effectiveness

Award identifier 0fc060affdbcd8b4788c59c19fac4a0b2d9b130d4c866f9f62fb1bebb895fff5Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,932

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
SDS International, Inc.
Proposal award date
2005-04-10
Contract end date
2006-01-10
UEI
SM6MMCZJGPM8
Solicitation number
2005.1
Topic code
AF05-078

Research abstract

In many cases, simulator quality is equated to the physical characteristics of hardware and software contained within a simulator system. In conjunction with this practice; the term ¡fidelity¡" is often used to express compiled performance of various simulator components. In view of these comparisons, between mechanical parameters and software performance, it is not unusual to find that fidelity requirements frequently reflect how much technology an organization can afford, instead of defining the level of technology necessary for producing an optimal training environment. Rather than base fidelity requirements solely upon inanimate parameters (optical, mechanical, and piezoelectric) SDS proposes development of a Biometic Fidelity Assessment Standardization Tool (BioFAST) that is based upon physiological responses, related to sensory and cognitive functions. Among the variables planned for BioFAST evaluation are sensory spatial reflexes such as: opto-kinetic cervical reflex, opto-kinetic nystagmus, vestibular ocular shifts, digital EEG, and stick control variations. This information will be integrated into a software package that also permits subjective scoring of fidelity criteria using simulator sickness questionnaires and Cooper-Harper surveys of observed vs. desired training outcomes. These and other potential measures can be combined into a composite score that will define simulator fidelity in terms of human compatibility and training accomplishment.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

25 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2008). Reported award amounts total $7,245,913. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.