SBIR/STTR Research Award

Manufacturing Oriented Nanocomposites

Award identifier 228b460daf0f9f1ff87d831fa74a0268b92dfa9fef6145a856c52c41994da0f9Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
CORNERSTONE RESEARCH GROUP INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
F7G8SHTEHNU7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Cornerstone Research Group, Inc., (CRG) proposes to develop a high specific strength nano-reinforced material using high volume-fractions of reinforcements and a low-cost manufacturing process. This process will align the nanofibers and enablepre-stressing each individual nanofiber as in traditional high strength composites. Similar achievements with traditional composites have resulted in the current state of the art that exists today. CRG proposes to develop materials and processes toaccomplish these tasks while maintaining affordability.With the development of this technology, the possibility exists for rapidly and inexpensively manufacturing high performance rocket motor casings with a high speed manufacturing production line. Other approaches to achieving high strength using carbonnanofibers or tubes are focused on detailed scientific optimization of treatments to achieve the best suited end groups for polymer adhesion or very expensive and highly non-practical alignment methods that create incredible manufacturing problems.Furthermore, most treatment processes are not developed to a scale necessary to yield enough treated nanofibers for composite processing investigations. Unfortunately these approaches have kept carbon nanofiber technology in the laboratory rather thantransitioning it to applications. This approach will remove the development from the lab into manufacturing in the near term. The benefits associated with the development of this concept will be overwhelming. First, the Air Force will accomplish increased range and/or payload of propulsion systems by reducing the inert weight and increasing the internal pressure capability ofpossibly all rocket motor systems while simultaneously reducing costs. Outside of the propulsion community the benefits of this new materials development will be witnessed with improved strength of all products where needed. The potential affordability ofthe material will make acceptability pervasive. Additionally, this materials technology would increase the consumption of nanofibers and nanotubes at significantly higher rates. Therefore, the forecasted cost of nanotubes may quickly be thwarted makingvolume production warranted and affordability near term.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

384 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2026). Reported award amounts total $175,315,942. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.