SBIR/STTR Research Award

An Inexpensive High-Current Betatron Using Fixed-Field Alternating Focusing and New Low-Loss Magnetic Materials

Award identifier 242e543d6dfc037660eb488e588945e447b5c132fa6e21e7a0b764ad2002d6b7Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$700,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RADIABEAM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Q6NDLV47NBT5
Solicitation number
DOE/SC-0072
Topic code
05 c

Research abstract

75621S Electron sources in the commercially important 5 to 20 MeV energy range are limited. These sources are used not only for the testing of advanced accelerator components but also for cancer treatment, medical device and mail sterilization, food irradiation, and plastics processing. Radio-frequency linear accelerators are the industry standard, but they are complicated and expensive. Betatrons hold the promise of being much simpler and less expensive, but previously they were limited to very low currents. This project will employ Fixed-Field-Alternating-Gradient focusing to increase the current capability of the betatron. Modern advances in low-loss magnetic materials also will be applied to increase the repetition rate. In Phase I, the focusing lattice was optimized, collective effects were examined to determine the stability limits, field magnets were designed, a betatron core power supply schematic was generated, and other hardware issues were addressed. The result of these activities is a robust, efficient, and extensive design for prototype fabrication. In Phase II, the field magnets, vacuum chamber, and diagnostics systems will be custom fabricated. Other major systems (the betatron core, power supplies, injector) will be purchased. Finally, the components will be integrated, and the accelerator will be commissioned to 6 MeV and more than 1 mA average current. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: A 6 MeV, high power, inexpensive electron source should find application in a number of markets: the well-developed medical-products-sterilization industry would readily adopt a less expensive technology; cargo inspection is a rapidly growing application of high-power accelerators, and reduced costs would allow the equipment to be more widely used at port facilities; the use of this device for mail sterilization would fit within the budget of every large postal facility in the country; radiation cancer treatment would be made considerably less expensive, making this life-saving treatment more available in developing nations.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

190 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2025). Reported award amounts total $96,783,846. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.