SBIR/STTR Research Award

EMP Protection for AFGSC Generators and HVAC Equipment

Award identifier 1e67975c9a33f0db1aab9798d7c7f5de4562b7772c88b607168ddb02604e96bfAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,799,156

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
SLNT INC
Proposal award date
2025-04-28
Contract end date
2027-07-28
UEI
E2STT5NKQ7K9
Solicitation number
23.3
Topic code
AF233-0036

Research abstract

The proposed generator and shelter solution for AFGSC stakeholders will be a larger form factor and a significant adaptation of SLNT’s current commercial offerings with new technical components and manufacturing techniques that include a magnetic RF-tight door entry (adapted from SLNT’s current Silent Pocket patented seal), RF Bandpass, earth grounding, collapsibility, packability, wearability and deployability in rapid fashion. Under this Phase II effort, SLNT will develop multiple Faraday shelter variants based on AFGSC requirements whose use cases for EMP protection range from generators to HVAC to electrical components.  Using similar materials found in SLNT bags, backpacks, and pouches, the SLNT team will adapt the core technology into a prototype “cinch” model. Furthermore, SLNT will develop a more traditional EMP protection prototype utilizing a wire mesh cage approach that will allow for cost and effectiveness comparison between the two approaches.  Both of these prototype variants are described in more detail below. SLNT’s Intellectual Property (IP) and technical methodology through Computer Aided-Design (CAD) tools like Solidworks will allow us to build more complex and technical products like the proposed shelter solutions while maintaining full efficacy of the desired functionality. SLNT will use all advanced manufacturing capabilities at hand such as high-frequency dielectric welding, technical sewing, laser cutting, and 3D printing for prototype fabrication. Using SLNT’s partners Keystone Compliance, MIT Lincoln Labs (MITLL), Advanced Functional Fabrics of America (AFFOA) SLNT will be able to stress test the prototypes at every stage of development to make sure that the shelter maintains benchmark metrics of full or selective RF signal attenuation and physical integrity for designated materials and prototypes. SLNT will be field testing with industry partners who will simulate real world scenarios ensuring that the shelter performs above and beyond in all requirements. The RF testing systems at partner facilities specifically have Anechoic chambers with the ability to cover a Radar cross section (RCS) of 800MHz - 100GHz. SLNT will test the proposed Faraday shelter solution as well as stand alone materials in the most dynamic and comprehensive ways possible.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

9 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2023–2025). Reported award amounts total $4,852,697. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.