SBIR/STTR Research Award

3D printed propellant-based propulsion systems for superior mission capability and affordability

Award identifier 1455a29f6751d92e2b0ecfdc8d9218dc7da549aae119f813d417c03dc1212ea8Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,249,622

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
FIREHAWK AEROSPACE INC.
Proposal award date
2024-09-30
Contract end date
2026-07-02
UEI
FKWJD9HL5931
Solicitation number
X23.7
Topic code
AFX237-PCSO1

Research abstract

Firehawk Aerospace (Firehawk) will demonstrate advanced 3D printed propulsion systems utilizing additively manufactured propellants to enhance the capabilities and affordability of solid rocket motors (SRMs) for the Department of the Air Force. Firehawk’s unique solution marries the advancements made in additive manufacturing (AM) and engineering design principles with modern rocket science resulting in novel solid rocket motor solutions, including next-generation hybrid rocket engines with printed fuel grains, novel monopropellant thruster system architectures, and solid rocket motor propellant grains under active development. Firehawk's innovative approach leverages commercially available off-theshelf (COTS) additive manufacturing equipment to produce thermoplastic-based propellants, which offer significant cost, logistical, and performance advantages over traditional manufacturing methods. This proposal is focused on the use of Firehawk’s proprietary additive manufacturing processes to optimize novel solid rocket motor propellant formulations compatible with conventional AM systems as an alternative to those cast and cured methods employed today. The program will involve the characterization and optimization of these propellants, focusing on achieving performance metrics that meet or exceed conventional SRM formulations while significantly reducing production times and costs. Key technical activities include thermal stability testing,  sensitivity characterization, extrusion trials, and subscale performance testing, culminating in static-fire tests of a 5” diameter propulsion system. Thermal stability and sensitivity testing will be performed where appropriate according to standard DoD testing methodologies. AM-produced solid propellant grains will be tested in a Firehawkdeveloped small-scale solid rocket motor ground-test article to evaluate the performance of these propellant formulations under representative motor operating conditions. Successful completion of these efforts will further demonstrate the viability of Firehawk’s thermoplastic-based solid propellants for use with conventional AM systems and characterize the performance of these formulations in a 5” class representative weapon system analog design.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2024). Reported award amounts total $1,374,211. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.