SBIR/STTR Research Award

Reducing Development Costs 100X with STPA-Sec

Award identifier 8736a02ec96faeb212349594ec64f4b66e033cf1aa6ca6a11179417836a5eb97Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$109,614

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Corellian Energy, LLC
Proposal award date
2024-05-10
Contract end date
2024-08-19
UEI
V51LPKGXCGK8
Solicitation number
X24.D
Topic code
AFX24D-PTCSO1

Research abstract

STPA-Sec is an innovative engineering methodology developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) designed to improve the security and safety of complex systems through early risk identification and mitigation. Unlike traditional security analysis techniques, which are often resource-intensive and deliver incomplete results, STPA-Sec requires significantly fewer resources and time, making it a cost-effective alternative. This methodology is particularly beneficial as it enables the addressing of potential vulnerabilities and security risks in the initial stages of system development, thereby avoiding costly late-stage modifications and reducing the time to market. The technical foundation of STPA-Sec is based on a systemic analysis that focuses on the identification and mitigation of unsafe control actions in complex systems. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the intricate interactions among system components, including human operators, and their potential to lead to hazardous states. By employing systems theory, STPA-Sec extends beyond traditional risk assessment methods, offering a comprehensive approach that considers the complexities and interdependencies inherent in modern systems. This ensures that security considerations are integrated throughout the system's lifecycle. Corellian Energy's proposal to develop a digital STPA-Sec platform in order to systematize and automate the STPA-Sec process. The platform will feature key functional components that reflect the STPA-Sec methodology's stages: (1) System Definition: Establishes a detailed understanding of the system, including its purpose, components, and interactions, setting the stage for a comprehensive analysis. (2) Identification of Unsafe Control Actions: Identifies control actions that could potentially lead to hazardous states, highlighting the importance of timing and sequence in system security. (3) Control Structure Analysis: Analyzes the system's control structure to pinpoint potential failure points or security vulnerabilities within the control hierarchy. (4) Causal Factors Analysis: Examines the root causes of potential hazards and security issues, considering both human and technological elements, to devise effective mitigation strategies. (5) Development of Security Requirements: Translates the analysis into specific security requirements and strategies to address identified risks and unsafe control actions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2024–2025). Reported award amounts total $219,050. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.