SBIR/STTR Research Award

Nanostructured Optical materials to enhance lethality of IR countermeasures

Award identifier 31b077109ec2097f69598400e44d606ddd0021d835f8d336f82f250187bd1055Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,250,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
NANOHMICS INC
Proposal award date
2024-01-18
Contract end date
2025-10-25
UEI
K39ENMXNLA73
Solicitation number
X23.6
Topic code
AFX236-DPCSO1

Research abstract

This proposal aims to establish a domestic manufacturing facility for the production of nano-structured optical (NSO) surface infrared (IR) anti-reflection (AR) treatments applied to IR crystals to enhance the lethality of infrared countermeasure (IRCM) and directed energy weapons (DEW) systems. Nanohmics Inc. (Austin, TX), working in support with AFRL Materials and Manufacturing (AFRL/RXE), AFRL Air Mobility Command (AFRL/AMC), BAE Systems (see letter of support), and The University of North Carolina, Charlotte (UNCC, see letter of support) will fabricate and characterize AR NSO treatments on Zinc Germanium Phosphide and Cadmium Silicon Phosphide ľ two state-of-the-art nonlinear crystals that can generate high-power mid-infrared (MWIR, wavelength = 3ľ5 micrometers) lasing. High-power, high-efficiency, broadly-tunable coherent sources in the MWIRáspectral band are coveted for infrared (IR) countermeasures, remote chemical sensing, and free-space optical communication. Sources based on optical nonlinear frequency conversion can generate broadly-tunable kilowatt-level coherent radiation over the entire MWIR spectrum. One factor that limits the source performance is the low optical damage threshold of anti-reflection thin-film coatings applied to the surfaces of the nonlinear crystal. Thin films absorption loss becomes prohibitively large at high optical intensities, and films subsequently are damaged due to thermal effects. Replacing thin film treatments anti-reflective nano-structured optical treatments have the potential to significantly increase the optical damage threshold given that that the structures are monolithically etched in the surface of the nonlinear crystal. Nanohmics Inc. proposed to develop a lithography-free method of applying random anti-reflective surface structure (rARSS) treatments to Zinc Germanium Phosphide and Cadmium Silicon Phosphide nonlinear crystals. The team will demonstrate that its Ĺthermodotĺ-based rARSS technology is a simple and cost-effective method to manufacture broadband (1.5 ľ 6 micron) AR treatments with superior damage thresholds compared to typical AR thin films. áááá

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

306 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2025). Reported award amounts total $109,302,435. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.