SBIR/STTR Research Award

High-Rate Low-Cost UAV Manufacturing Solution

Award identifier fab74a22483bd15a0347756c0ab90a325f57759edc2e2d8c5b74bbc9571cb045Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$139,633

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
CORNERSTONE RESEARCH GROUP INC
Proposal award date
2023-07-17
Contract end date
2024-01-16
UEI
F7G8SHTEHNU7
Solicitation number
23.1
Topic code
N231-069

Research abstract

The perceived objective is to generate a method that enables low-cost lightweight airframes produced in a way conducive to high- rate manufacturing. The production of air vehicles must rapidly increase in order to prepare for a war of attrition and increase the United States’ air superiority. As the desire for rapid development and production of composite air vehicles increases, the need for faster fabrication processes becomes more important. One of the more time-consuming elements of the aircraft fabrication process is the assembly of all the complex components required to create the air vehicle shape and structure. Typical aircraft assembly processes include individual skin and internal structure pieces that are mechanically fastened together or, in some cases, bonded together. The process for creating the provisions for fastening (typically hole drilling) and bonding, as well as the process for holding the pieces in the correct locations during assembly (use of assembly jigs), requires significant time and capital expense. In addition, these processes require inspection steps to ensure they were performed correctly. Ultimately, these labor- and capital-intensive processes increase the lead-time and cost of assembled aircraft structures. An alternate approach to reduce or eliminate these steps is desired to achieve goals of more rapid air vehicle development and production. Compression molding is a rapid composite forming process that forms and cures in minutes rather than hours, allows for a wide range of shapes and thickness, and allows for objects such as metal bosses to be imbedded into parts during forming. Typically used for compression molding is sheet molding compound (SMC), which is widely available in carbon and fiberglass options. This technology is proven to produce low-cost parts, with production part cost of under $200 per pound, not including NRE and tooling. This high-rate manufacturing process consists of rapidly cutting the SMC with a ply cutter, loading the material into the mold, closing the press and keeping it closed for 2 to 10 minutes, then removing the formed part from the mold to cool.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

384 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2026). Reported award amounts total $175,315,942. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.