SBIR/STTR Research Award

Tiered Cybersecurity Container Hardening for Platform One and Iron Bank

Award identifier f51625a4636586e42287cb2684e3a8bc0c4b538080b8b5ffe21542a792b87288Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,996

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
RAPIDFORT INC
Proposal award date
2022-08-24
Contract end date
2023-09-07
UEI
QLTEAANJEWN9
Solicitation number
X21.2
Topic code
AF212-CSO1

Research abstract

Software containers are applications. Think of them as the building blocks of modern software systems that contain large pieces of code required for modern software systems to operate. In the past, Iron Bank has been responsible for manually hardening this code, to DISA hardening standards, and then the 100,000 DAF software developers use these hardened applications to build secure software applications. One can think of these containers as the approved building blocks that allow secure software systems to be developed. This manual hardening takes considerable time, cost, and effort. Iron Bank started 2020 with 200 containers but now has over 1000+ containers that need to be supported. Iron Bank’s success has resulted in it now having too many containers to continue to harden manually and is encountering resource and scalability issues. The pipeline of supported containers is slowing down, and the productivity of the entire system (of 100,000 DAF software developers) is suffering because the supply of raw materials entering the development pipeline has become overwhelmed. To address this issue, Iron Bank is now moving to a Two-tiered system whereby they will continue to harden critical containers (Tier 2 Containers), but for the vast majority of containers downstream users will need to harden the containers themselves (Tier 1: Self-Serve Containers). RapidFort has developed automated profiling technology that automates this manual process, so what used to take months now can be done in minutes! Saving considerable time and effort and potentially tens of millions of dollars in reduced developer costs. In addition to the productivity savings, as part of a Phase 1 case study, RapidFort validated that its hardening is approximately 80% more effective than manual hardening. The result, immediate containers that are vastly more secure (80%), vastly cheaper to build and maintain (5% to 12%), and 300% faster to boot, while providing infrastructure cost savings estimated to be in the 1% to 2% range. In short, RapidFort’s technology is a game-changing solution to a critical problem the DAF software ecosystem is facing. This is coming at a time when cybersecurity concerns resulting from the Ukrainian conflict are at an all-time high.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

13 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2021–2024). Reported award amounts total $11,930,821. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.