SBIR/STTR Research Award

Day / Night Crew Served Weapon Sight System Solutions

Award identifier 35656fe4d7fd878deeae6be8e1f86223fa89b220f493aae05e42af8a17b33610Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$129,419

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
WILCOX INDUSTRIES CORP.
Proposal award date
2025-07-22
Contract end date
2026-05-21
UEI
NK2XC6X32AD6
Solicitation number
25.1
Topic code
N251-005

Research abstract

The Marines require a replacement for technologically obsolete thermal weapon sights (MWTS, HWTS) for medium 7.62mm (M240B) and heavy 12.7mm and 40mm (M2A1, MK 19) machine guns. These single function devices fail to provide target range determination and lack the clarity and range of systems used during the daylight. Also, newer emerging medium machine guns (MMG) have the potential to provide heavy machine gun range in a more compact weapon system in the near future. Wilcox plans to investigate modular and fully integrated solutions with careful consideration to existing reliable optical day sights in service. Wilcox plans to assess the integration of day cameras versus modular approaches for use of existing direct view optics in combination with modern, small pixel (10 microns) thermal weapon sights. Integration of day cameras has been met with significant user challenges in the past due to power demands, cost and performance.  The MK 19 poses some unique challenges based on its direct and indirect fire capability. The super elevation mode is an important parameter for consideration of various system trades.  The opportunity exists to take a fresh look at the problem. System trade studies will guide the effort under the Phase I effort considering the latest technological developments. The Phase I base objective is to define and develop a system architecture for a day and night capable target acquisition and engagement sight system for crew-served small arms weapon systems. The system combines the functionality of multiple legacy sight systems while providing additional performance and capabilities. Phase I will establish the feasibility of the system architecture by conducting technology trade studies and analysis of all architecture options. Technology trades that will be reviewed with the government include Integrated vs. Modular Approach, Range Performance, Optical Performance, Physical Performance, and Power Capability. The outcome of the Integrated vs. Modular Approach trade study will strongly influence the course of action for the rest of the trades. Wilcox and the government will work together to select the appropriate technology based on the objective results of the trade studies as well as the preferences of the user community.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2025). Reported award amounts total $3,161,696. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.