SBIR/STTR Research Award

Embedded Access to Signing of Science Terms and Definitions

Award identifier a6f8c9c7b77b10054c34d229daad6e045f3343b947f182eb3223adc94b8a01b2Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · Administration for Community Living

Award amount

$574,037

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
Administration for Community Living
Recipient company
VCOM3D INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
P7MYG7JPFPZ2
Solicitation number
HHS-2016-ACL-NIDILRR-BISB-0182
Topic code
n/a

Research abstract

This project develops, deploys, and evaluates Embedded Access to Signing of Science Terms and Definitions (EAS): a client-server software system that delivers American Sign Language (ASL) and Signed English (SE) language support to Deaf and hard-of-hearing (Deaf/HH) students accessing any Web page that includes science, math, or healthcare information. The goal of this project is make scientific and technical Web content accessible to Deaf/HH students and adults in their own first language as well as in English, such that they may understand, perform independent research, and make informed decisions based on information available on any Web site of interest, even though the grade level of the content may exceed their English language skills. The objectives are: (1) to increase the science vocabulary and understanding of Deaf middle and high school students, their educators, and interpreters, (2) to more fully engage the students in science and in STEM and healthcare careers, and (3) to prepare Deaf/HH students and adults to make informed decisions based on scientific understanding. The long-term anticipated outcomes include: (1) improved Deaf/HH student engagement, performance, and career opportunities in STEM subjects, (2) improved teacher and interpreter knowledge of scientific terms and their signs, and (3) enhanced capability of Deaf/HH persons to make informed decisions about healthcare, environment, and daily living. The expected products are (1) a cloud-based, extensible lexicon/repository of at least 6,000 signs and definitions for science, math, and healthcare terms, in English, ASL, and SE; and (2) Web browser extensions and mobile apps that automatically highlight any word in any Web page for which signs and signed definitions are included in the lexicon, which, upon clicking, will render signed animations of the terms and definitions. These products will be commercialized for use by individuals, groups of users, and organizations serving the Deaf/HH population.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

67 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2025). Reported award amounts total $20,904,646. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Education, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.