SBIR/STTR Research Award

Shipcom AI for Obsolescence Prediction

Award identifier f0b470ed986f6baec042b1e385dc02386cd8d1e1679e114bcae758b0afe4c8afAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$74,436

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
SHIPCOM FEDERAL SOLUTIONS LLC
Proposal award date
2025-04-08
Contract end date
2025-08-06
UEI
TM8MKSFK82N5
Solicitation number
24.4
Topic code
N244-P02

Research abstract

NAVSEA and Department of Defense (DoD) face challenges to manage vast and diverse equipment inventory. Obsolescence, driven by technological advancements, component shortages, and evolving geopolitical landscapes, greatly impacts operational effectives and readiness. Traditional methods of identifying obsolescence are often reactive and rely on manual analysis. They can lead to delays in product procurement and inefficient resource allocation. In the context of national defense,  obsolescence can have significant implications for various aspects of military capabilities. It not only applies to equipment and physical items, but also in outdated Commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software and operating systems that are now susceptible to cyberattacks. Based on our proprietary Shipcom AI Platform, Shipcom proposes to develop an AI/ML-enabled solution to predict obsolescence of DoD products within the NAVSEA supply network. Utilizing our Shipcom AI platform, NAVSEA will improve the organization’s capability to analyze diverse data sources to include technical specifications, maintenance records, market trends, and geopolitical factors. Our solution for AI-Powered Obsolescence will also identify equipment and support parts at risk from becoming obsolete. Shipcom AI will deliver NAVSEA the capability to make recommendations for informed decisions  sustainment, modernization, and lifecycle management, optimizing resource allocation and ensuring mission readiness. Shipcom has already begun conceptual development of an AI Obsolescence Application for the Department of Defense utilizing Internal Research and Development (IRAD) funding. Below we describe our proposed AI Obsolescence Application at its current beta-stage development. During Phase I, Shipcom will work with NAVSEA stakeholders to determine specific needs and use cases that we will utilize to develop our NAVSEA AI Obsolescence Solution in support of a Phase II Research and Development effort.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

9 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2025). Reported award amounts total $8,888,153. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Contractor profile

SHIPCOM FEDERAL SOLUTIONS LLC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.