SBIR/STTR Research Award

SCUBA Skin Conductance for Underwater Body Assessments

Award identifier f4bdcc3608e0d1aa3f8552d3ea29a5a2adb974fd2c0e2a53743ddb2053f576fdAwarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Health Agency

Award amount

$249,992

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Health Agency
Recipient company
MAXENTRIC TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Proposal award date
2023-10-05
Contract end date
2024-05-05
UEI
JL9DW4GMNJ53
Solicitation number
23.B
Topic code
DHA23B-003

Research abstract

As identified by the DHA STTR solicitation DHA23B-002, thereÆs a need for an innovative, wearable device which can monitor the electrodermal activity (EDA) of the wearer to prevent possible Central Nervous System Oxygen Toxicity (CNS-OT). This device includes form factor developments, accurate EDA readings, durability for sea-water environments, and on device computing to enable real-time feedback to the diver.??Ā To meet the demands of the DHA23B-002 STTR solicitation, the MaXentric led team proposes the Skin Conductance for Underwater Body Assessments (SCUBA) monitoring system. It is a wearable, flexible patch which provides real-time monitoring and recording of EDA for over 24hrs. Due to the high concentration of sweat glands in the palmar and plantar regions of the body, the optimal placement of the sensors is also the most obtrusive for divers. By integrating the sensing platform and on-board electronics into a flexible material, the proposed device will conform to the nonplanar and dynamic surfaces of the palmar and plantar regions. On-board processing will include computation of the time-varying index of EDA as well as motion artifact removal from accelerometer measurements. Stored data is wirelessly transmitted to a paired end user device (EUD) using a Bluetooth upon diver surfacing, providing valuable information for future dive planning and medical evaluation. The SCUBA system meets or exceeds the system specifications listed. During Phase I the team will design and simulate many of the SCUBA components to determine the feasibility and accuracy of creating a fully functional system. During Phase II a SCUBA system prototype will be constructed and delivered. For Phase III and beyond, underwater data transmission to a paired EUD will be developed for the finalized commercial product. SCUBA addresses the requirements with the following features in sea water:?Ā Record data for 24+ hours continuously?Ā Electrodermal Activity within 1 microsiemen of clinical grade device?Ā Sampling rate 100HzĀĀ Functional at depths up to 300 feet of sea waterĀ Functional at water temperatures between 32?-95?F?Ā Motion measurement?Ā

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

210 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2026). Reported award amounts total $112,803,093. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.