SBIR/STTR Research Award

Creating a Digital Twin of Legacy Aircraft - B-52

Award identifier ec673f1b852b6aa64fb0830b3b849cfdb4bf1ae05d05104b43ce5fe31817deb1Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,690,252

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2026

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
BEAST CODE LLC
Proposal award date
2025-11-06
Contract end date
2026-11-06
UEI
DA1PDLWQ7BH4
Solicitation number
24.2
Topic code
AF242-0001

Research abstract

Beast Code proposes to deliver a full aircraft-level digital twin of the B-52H Stratofortress, built using legacy 2D technical data, NAIR CAD, LiDAR, and photogrammetry scans, and deployed within Beast Core, an extensible visualization platform already operational across multiple DoD programs. This Phase II effort builds upon a completed Phase I pilot that demonstrated the feasibility of converting legacy data into structured, interactive 3D geometry with linked technical documentation and metadata overlays. The project will be executed in three sequential phases—Discovery, Production, and Refinement—spanning a 12-month period. All major system categories (Airframe, Propulsion, Electrical, Avionics, etc.) will be represented in the twin, organized according to USAF data structures and configuration. Key technical goals include validating geometry, integrating system metadata, linking authoritative documentation, visualizing sustainment workflows, and preparing for MBSE/PLM alignment through future integrations with CAMEO and Teamcenter. The Phase II digital twin will be deployed in a secure IL5 GovCloud environment with completed RMF documentation in pursuit of an Authority to Operate (ATO). A new research task has also been added to investigate simulation-driven approaches for platform longevity and airworthiness evaluation in future phases. This will include a third-party partner technical whitepaper on candidate simulation tools and visualization approaches. All development will be modular and scalable, ensuring the final delivery is immediately usable for sustainment stakeholders and extensible into a Phase III production environment. Throughout the effort, government subject matter expert (SME) validation will guide technical decision-making, data fidelity, and functional utility. Final deliverables include the digital twin environment, all structured data, a complete set of user documentation, and a government-reviewed SME validation report.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2026). Reported award amounts total $6,995,039. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Contractor profile

BEAST CODE LLC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.