SBIR/STTR Research Award

Dynamic Container Management Framework (DCMF)

Award identifier 26c97a9ffe754a698b1655141b74d3e73d604ca66001253cbb5cf3cb64a7536bAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$239,727

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
INNOVATIVE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Proposal award date
2020-07-08
Contract end date
2021-10-12
UEI
QEHMNH93DYH6
Solicitation number
00.1
Topic code
N201-047

Research abstract

AEGIS Combat System designs have been, traditionally, burdened by non-scalable, non-reusable and non-extensible design restrictions. These platforms fall short of providing a fully robust technology stack built around open and adaptable standards, which are required to enable cost effective and scalable architectures to meet the needs of future systems. Developing a Dynamic Container Management Framework (DCMF) as the foundation for modular future combatant system platforms and capabilities would allow for efficient, rapid, and cost-effective addition of new combat system capabilities. DCMF employs an open container initiative structure to enable isolation and virtualization for core services within DCMF. This allows for unencumbered tech insertion, including real-time loading, update, and deletion of services. The flexibility in adding modular software components reduces the time and cost associated with capability development by decoupling dependencies between combat system capabilities. Another objective of this research effort is to develop a software architecture with native services to support real-time data-exchange utilizing an IM/ICS service suite. DCMF leverages systems engineering modeling and analysis procedures to support automated testing and verification of interface requirements. This capability is especially critical with the increased ability to quickly upgrade capabilities within DCMF. Automated testing ensures adherence to performance standards while minimizing the impact to development speed, establishing the foundation for a continuous development / continuous integration environment. A key leverage point of the DCMF solution is IDT’s strong ability to transition to Phase II and beyond utilizing previous AEGIS experience and testing environments. Access to high fidelity evaluation of the designs and prototypes developed in Phase I and extensive experience with modeling and developing component interfaces for the AEGIS combat system favorably position IDT to successful transitioning of a Phase I effort.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

64 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2006–2025). Reported award amounts total $50,025,196. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Contractor profile

INNOVATIVE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.