SBIR/STTR Research Award

Nanomaterial Technologies for Long-Life Li-ion Batteries

Award identifier ca4b42a928ea9a40cd7bd6f2a720d48de3faef4de7a1eb73926c89d97cc9e8baAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,967

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
ADA TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Proposal award date
2011-08-11
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
NQEGVMEYYRT9
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-065

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Military communications satellites are trending to higher pulse power and total energy capacity levels in order to meet exponentially increasing satellite communications capacity requirements. As the demand for on-board power and total energy-storage capacity has continued to increase, Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries have become the new industry standard for use as rechargeable secondary batteries in space vehicles. Although numerous Li-ion batteries have been spaceflight qualified over the past ten years by both domestic and foreign suppliers, most of these batteries use electrode and electrolyte material technologies that are nearly 20 years old. As such, the only way to achieve the desired high cycle life with current spaceflight-qualified electrode and electrolyte materials is to substantially limit the allowed depth-of-discharge (DOD) and to control the operating temperature. Thus there exists considerable need within the spacecraft community develop advanced lithium-ion battery materials possessing considerable cycle-life while maintaining or exceeding the specific energy of current state-of-the-art (SOTA) technologies. To address this need, ADA Technologies, Inc., proposes to continue advancements made in Phase I to develop a highly stable lithium-ion cell system comprised of advanced nanocomposite electrodes and ionic liquid electrolytes enabling significant improvements cycle life. BENEFIT: The increased performance enabled by the proposed technology will allow for advanced lithium-ion batteries to meet the life-cycle and cycle-life performance requirements needed for current and future military and communication satellites. Furthermore, the developments undertaken will substantially improve the state-of-the-art of lithium-ion battery devices. Thus if successful, the resulting technology could have substantial commercial impact as the overall market for energy storage devices is estimated to be in excess of $6B per year. Spin-off applications include hybrid electric vehicles, utility grid applications, and personal electronics among others.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

274 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2025). Reported award amounts total $89,993,036. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.