SBIR/STTR Research Award

An Improved Prosthetic Bioactuator

Award identifier 78939dd9392d7c2f9124959cd4f51f42e2ced78bdd52b8cd5160ac4afca31835Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$199,992

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ADA TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
NQEGVMEYYRT9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Innovations in battery technology and microelectronics are now finding wide acceptance in the design of new prosthetic and orthotic appliances, while the actuators used to produce motion and force in these devices remain essentially unimproved. The overall goal of this multi-phase, expanded SBIR project is to adapt a new class of "active" materials--developed to efficiently convert electrical energy directly into motion and force for aircraft and spacecraft applications--into a technically advanced "bioactuator." Specifically designed for high-performance prosthetic devices such as hands, wrists, elbows, and shoulders, these novel bioactuators will also allow clinicians to create a new generation of "intelligent," "power-assisted" orthotic braces and supports that are not currently feasible. In Phase I, active material actuator capsules will be designed and integrated into additional hardware needed to drive practical appliances. Extensive functionality and reliability testing will be conducted on a prototype device to validate its performance and to make a determination of overall feasibility for continued development in Phases II and II. Successful completion of these multiple phases of work is expected to yield a family of bioactuators-each providing different output characteristics required for various appliances, but all tailored to provide the natural appearance and wide-ranging functionality that users desire in synthetic hand and limb replacements. These robust new bioactuators are anticipated to replace the fragile micrometer and gear-based devices that represent the current state of the art by offering much greater reliability, smaller size, lower weight, and lower overall cost to users. Their substantially improved performance and flexibility will allow clinicians to create prosthetic and orthotic appliances offering the comfort, natural appearance, and functionality long sought by users. In addition, the compact nature of active materials will be fully exploited to create small appliances ideally suited to children's functional needs.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

274 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2025). Reported award amounts total $89,993,036. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.