SBIR/STTR Research Award

CAIN: Counter Autonomy Inference Network

Award identifier 756f976fe151f089cf54d246b89c1a763a2d47a2d6005ee0912054c3ee8d79a1Awarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

Award amount

$1,971,701

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Recipient company
SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC.
Proposal award date
2024-04-01
Contract end date
2026-10-30
UEI
C12TQVKF5413
Solicitation number
20.3
Topic code
AF203-001

Research abstract

We will build a prototype (based on the results of Phase I studies) which is able to provide behavioral exploitation, adversarial force modeling, and network inference. CAIN will perform risk-aware experimentation on unaware or unwitting autonomous systems by simulating and predicting expected behavior. This capability will gather intelligence while being aware of how much additional risk is undertaken for each action. To predict adversarial behaviors, we will model the cyber-physical systems of adversarial platforms and impacts intervention strategies will have on adversarial autonomy behavior, providing an understanding of the adversary’s communication methods, strategies, and dependence. Under this capability, cyber-physical models will be built for adversarial forces that will then use Theory of Mind inference methods to predict adversarial reaction to intervention strategies. Furthermore, intelligent stopping criteria will be used to balance multiple objectives linked to the Theory of Mind (ToM) of an autonomous platform. Under this capability, intervention strategy impacts on adversaries will be predicted and will balance the trade-off between accuracy of classification and risk to discovering intent by adversaries to send a stop-signal to end the operation. The system developed under CAIN will have a two-part feedback system composed of an Intervention Decision Aid (IDA) and a Level of Autonomy (LoA) Classifier. The IDA and LoA classifier will both balance covert tactics with behavioral classification of autonomous platform architecture. Sensors will provide environmental and situational information that is fed into this two-part feedback system of CAIN. The IDA and LoA classifier represent the core work proposed under CAIN to ingest sensor information and classify the level of autonomy of a platform. AUTOSENSE utilizes a hypergame planner on a Markov decision process (MDP) to decide which intervention strategies to take that simultaneously limits the risk to discovering intent by an adversary and increases the accuracy of the LoA classifier.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

464 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $186,567,405. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.