SBIR/STTR Research Award

Rapid Emitter Geolocation using Single UAS

Award identifier b2ecab22262e43d260dc65e53d1c88393647b40a0b36a8223d7cc8769f52610dAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$174,794

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
INFORMATION SYSTEMS LABORATORIES INC
Proposal award date
2024-01-18
Contract end date
2025-03-31
UEI
FAK5JKUKRXJ1
Solicitation number
23.4
Topic code
N234-P02

Research abstract

A comprehensive survey of threat radar positions (range as well as bearing) including short up-time and intermittent (on/off) emitters is extremely valuable during a conflict. A safe course can be plotted for friendly aircraft, electronic warfare (EW) systems can effectively jam radars using far less power (Electronic Attack (EA)), or a missile can be launched to neutralize possible threats (Kinetic Attack (KA)). Adversaries understand the need to limit their emissions. To decrease their vulnerability, radar operators perform searches using short up-time scanning techniques to avoid detection and/or geolocation. Solid-state transmitters utilizing agile, low-power pulse Doppler waveforms are be-coming increasingly prevalent in modern radar threats. These low-power emitters may also be intermittent and adaptive making them difficult to detect or geolocate. Active Electronically Scanned Arrays (AESAs) employ random beam azimuths and countermeasures to avoid detection. Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) threats to aircraft have become increasingly mobile and difficult to detect from the air before an engagement e.g., Shoot-and-Scoot (S&S) SAMS.Ā Historically, passive airborne radar locating systems have relied on a time-intensive process (Radio Frequency Direction Finding (RFDF)) to cumulatively plot successive Lines of Bearing (LoBs) to the target radar until an accurate geolocation (fix) of the radar could be determined. Usually, minutes are required for RFDF to achieve a suitable angular bearing spread to develop a reasonable geolocation estimate for an emitter. Alternative approaches such as time difference-of-arrival (TDOA) require precise coordination between multiple platforms, which can greatly increase system cost and complexity and are not practical during tactical encounters in contested airspace. ISL has developed a passive approach to rapidly geolocate both littoral and land-based radars. We envision this technology implemented as an automated software mode resident on a (group 2 or 3) Unmanned Air System (UAS).Ā In this proposal, we propose to expand the technique to militarily relevant emitters that employ random beam azimuths such as an AESA. Our initial approach emphasizes progressively complex simulation to validate the concept. In Phase I (base), the geolocation performance and approach will be demonstrated using simulated data from our commercial M&S environment, RFView« (see recent SBIR Success Story press release https://www.sbir.gov/node/1526807). Using RFView«, we donÆt need RF measurements to develop the solution. In the Phase I (option), we will port the primary software routine to an extremely low power computational adjunct and demonstrate the reduced timeline.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

155 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2025). Reported award amounts total $67,503,247. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Education

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.