SBIR/STTR Research Award

SeaQ for STEM Education

Award identifier 9cdad64554b4c7fb4a30e0cdfcd2c3c513445486d4d7fe923ad43b1edff78696Awarding agency Department of Education · Institute of Education Sciences

Award amount

$250,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Education
Branch
Institute of Education Sciences
Recipient company
FUTURE ENGINEERS LLC
Proposal award date
2025-09-12
Contract end date
2026-05-11
UEI
E1F8BYXUJ327
Solicitation number
91990025R0002
Topic code
91990025R0002

Research abstract

SeaQ is a STEM education product that empowers K-12 students to build scientific instrumentation for ocean research. Students will apply engineering design skills to collect data in remote locations beyond the classroom.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2025). Reported award amounts total $2,405,469. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Education

Agency intelligence

Department of Education

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.